How much truth is in the popular graphic above? How many assumptions? Does science (as opposed to scientism) support the assumptions and conclusions presented in this retelling of Edward Bullard’s original theory better than any other theory? Or, is this simply the best fit for a worldview dedicated to the altar of materialism?

Friends, on the matter of the theory v. truth, if you have never really examined the subject, may I recommend that you start with this 2017 article in Forbes written by a PhD scientist and atheist:
www.forbes.com/…/startswithabang/2017/11/22/scientific…/amp/

As always, you can email questions/comments to dankentucky@gmail.com