Pangea

How much truth is in the popular graphic above? How many assumptions? Does science (as opposed to scientism) support the assumptions and conclusions presented in this retelling of Edward Bullard’s original theory better than any other theory? Or, is this simply the best fit for a worldview dedicated to the altar of materialism?

Friends, on the matter of the theory v. truth, if you have never really examined the subject, may I recommend that you start with this 2017 article in Forbes written by a PhD scientist and atheist:
www.forbes.com/…/startswithabang/2017/11/22/scientific…/amp/

As always, you can email questions/comments to dankentucky@gmail.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s